β° Timing analysis
Lockout is scheduled ONE DAY BEFORE Barbara's Rule 61.04 filing deadline (Aug 21). If she doesn't file with the Divisional Court AND serve the Sheriff before Aug 20 at 1:15 PM, enforcement proceeds and you have vacant possession before her appeal window even closes.
Days for Barbara to file + serve Sheriff: β days remaining before lockout
Days from lockout to abandonment deadline: 1 day. Even if she files Aug 21, a stay filed after enforcement is prospective β it does not retroactively invalidate an enforcement completed in good faith. (In theory, if her appeal later succeeds on the merits, she could seek restoration of possession or damages β but this is a very-low-probability chain given the weak grounds.)
β Wed Aug 19 registry check β CONFIRMED CLEAN
Called Divisional Court Registry: No Notice of Appeal filed. No Certificate of Stay issued. Nothing on record in Barbara Ruth Green's name.
Sheriff lockout proceeds Thu Aug 20 at 1:15 PM as scheduled.
Remaining risk window: Thu 8:30-11:00 AM. Barbara would need to file + obtain Certificate + serve Sheriff β 7-step sequence β in ~4 hours to stop the lockout. Functionally impossible.
Probability lockout proceeds uninterrupted: ~95%.
Only remaining action: One more registry check Thu 8:30 AM as belt-and-suspenders. Then drive down.
β Sheriff notification β do NOT assume they'll call you
Earlier assumption: if Barbara files AND serves the Sheriff, the Sheriff will call to cancel. Do not rely on this. Sheriff offices are not required to proactively notify landlords of stays. Their obligation is to enforce writs, not to communicate about status changes.
Adjusted plan: Registry check Wed 3pm + second registry check Thu 9am before driving down. Do NOT proactively call the Sheriff β that risks prompting them to do due diligence they wouldn't otherwise do.
π The 3 things Barbara must do to stop the lockout
Filing the appeal alone does NOT stop the Sheriff. She needs:
- Properly file the Notice of Appeal at Divisional Court (fix affidavit, pay fee, file proof of service) β triggers legal stay
- Obtain a Certificate of Stay from the Divisional Court by submitting a requisition
- Physically deliver the Certificate of Stay to the Sheriff's office and confirm receipt (per Divisional Court Practice Direction, this is the tenant's responsibility)
All 3 must happen before 1:15 PM Thu Aug 20 to stop the lockout. As of Wed morning she has completed 0 of 3.
Even if she completes step 1 alone, the Sheriff will still enforce because they have no Certificate of Stay in their file. She has to complete all 3.
π Print this. Read it word-for-word. 90 seconds.
The call is just a script + notetaking. No conversation required. Print this card, dial the number, read the paragraph, write down what they say, thank them, hang up.
The style of cause would be Green versus Seetharaman.
It's an appeal from a Landlord and Tenant Board order β the LTB file was LTB-L-016028-26.
Could you check two things for me:
One β has a Notice of Appeal been filed?
Two β has a Certificate of Stay been issued?"
- Registry clerks handle 50+ of these calls a day. It's routine to them.
- You are not asking for legal advice. You are asking for two facts about a public court filing. That's what they do.
- They will not ask why you want to know. They don't care.
- If they DO ask, say: "I'm the respondent in the LTB matter." That's it. No more.
- If they can't find the file, they'll say so β that IS the answer (no filing = safe for tomorrow).
- Whatever you hear, thank them and hang up. You process the answer AFTER the call.
After you hang up: match the answer to the decision matrix below to know what to do next.
π― Decision matrix based on what the clerk said
Optional follow-up ONLY if they answer no to both:
Some clerks will note attempted-but-rejected filings; others won't. Skip this if you don't feel comfortable asking.
| Filing | Certificate | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | No | Nothing exists | β Proceed with lockout. Do 9am registry check tomorrow. |
| Yes | No | Stay exists on paper, but Sheriff has nothing in their file | β Proceed with lockout. Sheriff acts on their file. Do second registry check Thursday morning as belt-and-suspenders. No lawyer needed for this scenario. |
| Yes | Yes | She can serve Sheriff any moment | π¨ Only now do you need a lawyer. Call Petar, or Vardag, or whoever is fastest. Do NOT drive down until stay is resolved. |
DO NOT mention the Aug 20 lockout, don't explain the backstory, don't volunteer that you're the respondent landlord. Professional neutral tone only.
π« Do NOT call the Sheriff to "confirm" the appointment
Earlier draft of this playbook had you calling the Sheriff to confirm the appointment status. On reflection, that's the wrong move. Calling prompts the Sheriff to do due diligence they wouldn't otherwise do β a cautious clerk might query the Divisional Court system for any pending appeal and flag/pause the file if they find one. This creates a risk that doesn't otherwise exist.
The registry check alone tells you what you need to know:
- If registry says nothing filed and no Certificate β Sheriff cannot have received anything, because nothing exists. Safe to proceed.
- If registry says filing yes, Certificate yes β THEN it's worth confirming with the Sheriff, because that's when Barbara has ammunition to actually serve them.
Default: silence with the Sheriff. Only call them if the registry tells you something changed.
π¨ Active Threat
Barbara Green emailed purported Divisional Court appeal documents on Aug 11, 2026 at ~9pm from bmacic5653@yahoo.ca. Documents are defective and unfiled. She has until Aug 21, 2026 to actually file with the court or the appeal is deemed abandoned under Rule 61.04.
Immediate need: Colin (or you) verify silently with Hamilton Divisional Court registry whether she has actually filed. Do not prompt her.
β Wins to date
- Original eviction order granted May 14, 2026 (default win)
- Tenant's review request DENIED July 30, 2026 (Member Jane Dean)
- Stay of eviction lifted immediately July 30, 2026
- Certified copies of both orders in your possession
- Sheriff filed early August 2026, enforcement fee paid
- Waiting on Sheriff's 3-day call for lockout
- New parallel L1 filed by Colin (LTB-L-057613-26) as insurance β hearing Sept 9
β Watch this week
- Divisional Court registry check β has Barbara actually filed?
- Sheriff phone call β could arrive any day now with 3-day notice
- Barbara's next move β if she's serious, she'll file by Aug 21; if she's bluffing, she won't
Quick actions
Today's Playbook β Sheriff Playbook Scripts & Templates Appeal AnalysisToday's Playbook β Aug 12, 2026
PRIORITY 1 β Silent registry verification. Colin (or you) calls the Hamilton Divisional Court / Superior Court of Justice registry (905-525-5321 is the general courthouse number; specific registry line may differ) and asks: "Has a Notice of Appeal been filed in the matter of Barbara Ruth Green v. Sarayu Seetharaman relating to LTB-L-016028-26?" Do NOT email Barbara.
Priority order for today
- Silent registry check (above) β the single most important information
- Preserve Barbara's Aug 11 email β Gmail β open email β three-dot menu β "Show original" β save as text
- Reply to Colin β confirm you filed Sheriff last week, request registry check, ask about lift-stay motion cost if she files
- Do NOT contact Barbara β anything you send prompts her to complete the filing
- Do NOT call the Sheriff β let them call you in the normal course
- Line up a licensed locksmith for lockout day standby β call 2-3 Hamilton locksmiths, get quotes, confirm they can be reached on 3 days' notice
If registry says: NO appeal filed yet
- Barbara has emailed threats but no actual court filing
- Countdown to Aug 21, 2026 starts β she has 10 days from service (Aug 11) to file
- You are in the clear. Sheriff enforcement can proceed if scheduled
- Monitor: Colin (or you) check the registry every 2-3 days between now and Aug 22
If registry says: YES appeal is filed with court file number
- Automatic stay under Rule 63.01 is in effect from moment of filing
- Sheriff will pause enforcement once notified (usually by tenant serving a filed copy on Sheriff)
- Immediate priority: motion in Divisional Court to lift stay under LTB Appeals Practice Direction (Oct 2023)
- Colin cannot represent at Divisional Court β decide: self-represent or limited-scope lawyer retainer ($3-6k range)
- Grounds for lift-stay motion are strong (no rent ever paid, weak appeal grounds, factual review already done)
Checklist for the week
Full Case Timeline
Players & Contacts
π¨βπ©βπ§ Your side
β Paralegal (LTB only β cannot represent at Divisional Court)
π¨ββ Divisional Court counsel candidates
Petar Guzina Β· Guzina Law Call scheduled Mon Aug 17
Joshua Azan Β· LAR Law Awaiting callback
π― Monday's 7-question call script (for Petar Guzina)
- Do you handle Divisional Court lift-stay motions on LTB appeal files?
- Can you be on standby for an emergency motion by end of business Wednesday if the tenant files an appeal Mon-Wed?
- Fixed fee for a limited-scope retainer covering: (a) drafting the motion record; (b) appearing at the return of the motion; (c) obtaining an order lifting the stay?
- What is your view on the appeal's merits based on the documents I send you?
- If the tenant hasn't filed by Aug 20 and the lockout proceeds, do you also handle risk of a bad-faith counter-application after eviction?
- Do you take limited-scope retainers, or only full retainers?
- What's your trust deposit requirement? (usually 50% upfront)
If he can't answer #1 and #2 with confident yes, he's not the right lawyer.
Josh Azan follow-up message (Mon AM)
π’ The tenants
Barbara Ruth Green
bamaccx@gmail.combmacic5653@yahoo.caAshley MacIntyre
bmacic5***@gmail.comπ Enforcement + court
Hamilton Sheriff / Court Enforcement Office
LTB & Divisional Court
Money & Damages Tracker
How the numbers work
From original May 14, 2026 order:
- Fixed arrears + filing fee: $6,336
- Daily compensation from May 1, 2026: $67.40 per day
- Simple interest 4%/year on unpaid balance from May 26, 2026
- Cap on daily comp accumulation: $50,000 (excluding costs)
From new L1 (LTB-L-057613-26):
- Rent claimed for Feb-Jul 2026: $12,300 (6 months Γ $2,050)
- Filing fee: $186
- Total: $12,486
Note: The two amounts overlap in the Feb-Apr rent that was already the basis of the original order. In practice a Member reconciles to avoid double recovery. Colin can pick whichever number to advance for money-judgment purposes.
Amount growing daily
| Date | Days from May 1 | Daily comp total | + Arrears + fee | = Grand total |
|---|
Small Claims Court collection track
After Sheriff enforcement, file the LTB order with Small Claims Court under s.85 of the RTA. This makes it a Small Claims judgment enforceable by:
- Wage garnishment (up to 20% net wages, ~$130 filing fee)
- Bank garnishment (one-shot capture of account balance, ~$130 filing fee)
- Writ of seizure & sale (personal property, ~$165)
- Examination of judgment debtor (force tenants to disclose finances under oath, ~$110)
Money judgment portion of the LTB order does not expire on Nov 26, 2026 (only eviction enforcement does). It's renewable indefinitely under the Limitations Act. See D_Small_Claims_Enforcement_Plan.md.
π‘ Realistic collectability
Honest assessment: tenants who never paid rent may have nothing to garnish. Before spending on enforcement, do an examination of judgment debtor (Form 20H) first β it forces them to disclose employer, bank, assets. Only then decide whether garnishment is worth pursuing. Judgment sits on their credit report for 6+ years regardless.
Sheriff Playbook
β Current status
Filed early August 2026. Enforcement fee paid. Waiting for Sheriff to call 3 days before scheduled lockout.
You do NOT need to file anything else. You do NOT need to go back to the Sheriff's office.
When the Sheriff calls β script
What to say:
What NOT to say:
- Do NOT mention Barbara's Aug 11 email or the purported appeal
- Do NOT ask "what if she appeals?"
- Do NOT suggest delay
- Do NOT volunteer anything about the tenants' situation
The Sheriff enforces the writ they have on file. They don't ask about pending matters and you don't have to volunteer.
The critical timing questions β answered
Q: If Divisional Court says "no filing" today and Sheriff calls tomorrow, what do I say?
Say nothing about the appeal. You are not obligated to inform the Sheriff of an appeal that has not been filed with the court. Emailed documents from an unrepresented tenant are not an appeal. Only a filed and stamped Notice of Appeal creates the automatic stay under Rule 63.01.
Confirm the enforcement date, arrange locksmith, thank the officer, hang up.
If a judge later asks whether you knew about the "appeal", you truthfully say: "Barbara sent me Word documents claiming she was appealing, but I had no evidence she had actually filed anything with the court." That's fully defensible.
Q: What if Barbara files with the court DURING the 3 days between the Sheriff's call and enforcement?
Legal effect: The moment she files, the automatic stay under Rule 63.01(3) activates. The Sheriff cannot lawfully proceed.
But who tells the Sheriff? The tenant does. It's Barbara's obligation (or her legal representative's) to serve the Sheriff with a filed, stamped copy of the Notice of Appeal and typically a Certificate of Stay. You do NOT have to notify the Sheriff.
Practically:
- If Barbara files AND serves the Sheriff before enforcement day β Sheriff pauses, you get a call
- If Barbara files but does NOT serve the Sheriff β enforcement can and will proceed
- If you find out about a filing (e.g. Colin sees it on a registry check the morning of enforcement), the safer legal read is: do not proactively notify the Sheriff yourself; let Colin advise before you attend
You have no positive legal duty to inform the enforcement authority of the tenant's court filings. The onus is on the appellant.
Q: What if the Sheriff evicts and THEN she files an appeal within 10 days?
This is the strongest position for you. Once enforcement is complete:
- Physical possession has transferred back to you
- Locks are changed, tenants are out
- The stay operates prospectively, not retroactively β even if she files later, that doesn't reverse the completed eviction
- To get back in, she'd need an actual court order reversing the eviction (much higher bar than just filing an appeal)
Her only remedy at that point would be a damages claim if she eventually wins the appeal β but she owed rent the whole time, so damages would be nil.
This is why speed matters. Every day between now and the lockout is a day she could theoretically file and pause it. Once the lockout is done, you're in the strongest possible position.
Enforcement day checklist
What actually happens at the enforcement
- Sheriff (or Court Enforcement Officer) arrives at the scheduled time
- They knock, announce themselves, wait for response
- If tenant present: they are given ~10 minutes to gather essentials (meds, ID, essentials)
- If no answer: Sheriff has authority to have door opened; you pay locksmith on the spot for entry
- Sheriff verifies the unit is vacated and hands vacant possession to you
- Locksmith immediately rekeys all locks
- You photograph condition of the unit before touching anything
- Tenant belongings remain in unit β you store them 72 hours per s.41 RTA
- After 72 hours, you may dispose of belongings
π Aug 20 Lockout Playbook
Event details
Date: Thursday, August 20, 2026
Time: 1:15 PM (Sheriff arrives) β arrive by 12:45 PM
Address: 461 Green Rd, Unit 619, Stoney Creek, ON L8E 5B4
Print this page. Bring a paper copy. Phones die.
Pre-lockout checklist β night before (Wed Aug 19)
Lockout day timing β minute by minute
| Time | Action |
|---|---|
| 11:30 AM | Leave home. Bring folder + video-ready phones + cash + boxes/bags/supplies. |
| 12:15 PM | Arrive at 461 Green Rd building. Park in visitor parking. Text locksmith to confirm on-site. |
| 12:45 PM | Sarayu + Abhi on-site in the corridor near Unit 619. Begin video recording (discreetly). |
| 1:00 PM | Locksmith arrives with tools. Verify credentials. Do NOT knock on unit door yet. |
| 1:15 PM | Sheriff arrives. Introduce yourselves. Sarayu presents photo ID. Sheriff takes lead. |
| 1:15β1:25 PM | Sheriff knocks, announces, waits 5β10 min for response. |
| 1:25 PM | If no answer: locksmith opens door. Sheriff enters first, walks through unit, confirms no one inside. |
| 1:30 PM | Sheriff formally transfers possession to Sarayu. Sheriff leaves. |
| 1:30β1:45 PM | Locksmith rekeys front door. New keys handed to Sarayu. |
| 1:45β2:30 PM | Full walkthrough with video: every room, every closet, appliances, damage, valuables, pets, perishables. |
| 2:30β3:00 PM | Consolidate obviously personal items (wallet, ID, mail, phone chargers) into labelled boxes near door. |
| 3:00 PM | Send formal retrieval notice to Barbara (email + text). See script below. |
| 3:15 PM | Text Colin: "Eviction complete. Vacant possession secured. No incidents." |
| 3:30 PM | Leave premises. Unit secured. Wait 72 hours for retrieval window. |
If Barbara IS home when Sheriff arrives
She has no legal right to stop the eviction. Sheriff will execute the writ regardless. She may:
- Ask for a few minutes to grab essential items (medication, ID, phone, keys) β Sheriff typically allows
- Ask about picking up remaining belongings β answer: "Within 72 hours, arrange in writing"
- Try to argue with you or the Sheriff β do not engage; Sheriff manages her
Rules for you:
- Stay calm, quiet, minimal words. Yes. No. Please. Thank you.
- Do NOT touch her. Do NOT get within arm's reach. Do NOT block her path.
- Do NOT discuss the case, the rent, the appeal, or anything substantive.
- Video the entire encounter openly (Ontario is one-party consent β no permission needed).
- Let the Sheriff do the talking.
If pets or children are found inside
Pets:
- Sheriff will NOT remove the pet β that's not their role
- You cannot legally harm or turn out the pet
- Contact Hamilton Animal Services: 905-574-3433
- Or coordinate with Barbara to have someone pick up within 72 hours
- Photograph the pet in place; document the discovery
Children (unlikely β Ashley moved out and no grandchildren on lease):
- Sheriff will contact parent/guardian, or Children's Aid Society if no parent reachable
- Not your responsibility to arrange care
72-hour retrieval protocol (Aug 20 β Aug 23 at 1:30 PM)
Immediately after lockout β send this message
Send by BOTH email and text to Barbara (bamaccx@gmail.com and 289-659-5628 / 647-509-3262). Screenshot both.
Barbara,
The Sheriff enforced LTB Order LTB-L-016028-26 today, August 20, 2026, at 1:15 PM. Vacant possession has been transferred to the landlord.
You have until Sunday, August 23, 2026 at 1:30 PM to arrange retrieval of your personal belongings from the unit. This is 72 hours from the transfer of possession, as required under section 41 of the Residential Tenancies Act.
Please reply in writing (email or text) with a proposed 90-minute pickup window between 10:00 AM and 6:00 PM on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. A representative will be present to facilitate. You will not be permitted to enter the unit itself; your belongings will be staged outside the unit for you.
After 1:30 PM on August 23, 2026, remaining belongings may be disposed of.
All future communications should be in writing.
Structuring the pickup β safest approach
- Fixed 90-minute window β no open-ended visits
- Two people on your side β never do the retrieval alone
- Belongings staged outside the unit β hallway, foyer, or building's storage area. She does NOT re-enter the unit.
- Video the entire encounter openly (Ontario one-party consent). If she objects: "This is being recorded to document the retrieval. If you don't want to be recorded, we can reschedule."
- Say very little. Yes. No. Please. Thank you. Refuse any conversation about the case, the rent, or the appeal.
- Do NOT touch personal papers or open boxes β bad optics, and she could allege you took something
- Signed receipt at end: "I, Barbara Green, on [date] at [time], retrieved my personal belongings from Unit 619 461 Green Rd, and confirm no property was withheld from me by the landlord." If she refuses to sign, video the refusal.
If she becomes aggressive during retrieval
- Stop the retrieval. "This isn't working. Please leave. We can reschedule."
- Step outside β never let her position between you and the exit
- Call 911 if physical aggression, threats of harm, or refusal to leave: "I need police at 461 Green Rd Unit 619. A former tenant is refusing to leave my property and I feel unsafe."
- If just verbally hostile: call non-emergency 905-546-4925, request officers to keep the peace
- Do NOT physically remove her β no touching, no blocking, no pushing. Removal is police work.
- Keep video recording from the moment things escalate until police arrive
Emergency contacts
| Contact | Number | When |
|---|---|---|
| 911 | 911 | Immediate physical threat or safety concern |
| Hamilton Police non-emergency | 905-546-4925 | She refuses to leave, verbal hostility, need officers to keep peace |
| Hamilton Animal Services | 905-574-3433 | Pet found in unit |
| Colin Mitchell (paralegal) | 289-878-5111 | Legal question during lockout |
| Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) | 905-645-5323 | Sheriff issues before/after (not during) |
After 72 hours β disposal (if no retrieval)
- After Aug 23 at 1:30 PM you may legally dispose of remaining items
- Photograph everything one more time before disposal (protection against false claims)
- Book junk removal service for Aug 24-25
- For obviously valuable items (jewellery, ID, laptop, phone), consider retaining for 30 days with formal written notice β not required but reduces T2 damages exposure
- Keep receipts for disposal costs β may be recoverable in Small Claims
What to do if things go WRONG
Sheriff cancels at the door (Barbara filed and served in the last few hours)
If the Sheriff arrives and says "your enforcement has been stayed by a Divisional Court appeal", accept it professionally. Ask for:
- Written confirmation of the cancellation reason
- Copy of the stay documentation they received
- Confirmation your Sheriff file remains active for future enforcement
Do NOT argue with the Sheriff. Immediately call Colin (289-878-5111) and your Divisional Court counsel. This triggers emergency lift-stay motion.
Barbara arrives during the lockout with a court order or lawyer
Ask to see the document. If it's a genuine court-issued stay order signed by a Divisional Court judge, the Sheriff will honor it. If it's not (unsigned document, printout of Rule text, letter from a lawyer): the Sheriff proceeds.
Photograph any document she presents. Do not argue. Do not confirm or deny anything about the appeal. Let the Sheriff assess.
Belongings are extensive / hoarding conditions / unit uninhabitable
If the unit contains excessive belongings, biohazards, or is otherwise unmanageable, do NOT try to consolidate alone. Options:
- Photograph everything, close and secure the door, deal with it Monday
- Book a bailiff service for supervised removal ($500-1,500)
- Book a hoarding cleanup specialist ($2,000-8,000, insurance may cover)
72-hour clock still starts at transfer of possession regardless of how long cleanup takes.
You or Sarayu are threatened or assaulted
Call 911 immediately. Do not fight back. Retreat to a public area (hallway, parking lot). Wait for police. Get medical attention if any physical contact occurred. File a police report the same day. This becomes evidence in any subsequent civil or LTB proceeding.
Locksmith doesn't show
Have a backup locksmith number saved. If neither shows: ask the Sheriff to give you 30 minutes to secure one. If truly stuck, use bolt lock or padlock temporarily and book locksmith for same day. Do NOT leave the unit unlocked overnight β you're now responsible for security.
Print-friendly one-pager
To print this page: Cmd+P (Mac) or Ctrl+P (Windows). In print options, choose "Save as PDF" or send to printer. Bring the paper copy to the lockout.
Some browsers may print all tabs. If so, print just this section by right-clicking β "Print selection" or copy the content into a document.
βοΈ Lift-Stay Motion (self-representation guide)
When to activate this playbook
Trigger: Registry check confirms Barbara has actually FILED her Notice of Appeal at the Divisional Court (not just emailed you).
Consequence: Automatic stay under Rule 63.01 pauses Sheriff enforcement. Sheriff will call to cancel the Aug 20 lockout.
Your response: Motion to lift the stay under Rule 63.02(1)(b) + the Divisional Court's Practice Direction on LTB Appeals (October 2023).
Realistic path: retain a lawyer for a limited-scope retainer ($3-5k). If cost-prohibitive, self-representation is possible β this section is that guide.
What you're asking the court to do
The relief you seek in your Notice of Motion:
- An order lifting the stay imposed by Rule 63.01 arising from the tenant's Notice of Appeal, so the Sheriff may enforce the eviction
- In the alternative: an order requiring the tenant to pay ongoing rent of $2,050/month plus a lump sum toward accumulated arrears as a condition of maintaining the stay
- An order requiring the tenant to perfect the appeal within a short timeframe (14-21 days) failing which the appeal is dismissed
- Costs of the motion on a substantial-indemnity basis
You do NOT need to convince the court the appeal has no merit at this stage. You need to convince the court that (a) the balance of prejudice favors lifting the stay, and (b) the appeal has no arguable merit sufficient to justify the stay's ongoing harm to you.
The legal test β 3 factors
Courts apply a modified RJR-MacDonald test to lift-stay motions in LTB appeals:
- Serious issue on the appeal. If the appeal is frivolous or has no arguable merit, this favors lifting the stay. Your position: Barbara's 3 grounds are either (a) already litigated at review, (b) fabricated (no transcript to support), or (c) discretionary/factual (not a question of law under s.210 RTA).
- Irreparable harm to the appellant if stay is lifted. If Barbara can be adequately compensated in damages, no irreparable harm. Your position: she can find alternate rental housing; her harm is compensable; she has never paid rent so there is no equitable claim to continued occupation.
- Balance of convenience. Weigh both parties' interests. Your position: you have suffered 6+ months of free occupancy with zero rent; every day the stay continues you lose $67.40 in daily compensation; you have a valid LTB order that has already survived review; tenants have shown no good faith.
Practice Direction addition: the court can order rent-payment as a condition of maintaining stay. This is your fallback: if the court won't fully lift, at minimum condition the stay on Barbara paying $2,050/month going forward + a portion of arrears (say $6,000) into court within 14 days.
Documents you'll need to file
- Notice of Motion (Form 37A) β states the relief you're seeking and the grounds. 2-3 pages.
- Affidavit of Sarayu Seetharaman β sworn statement of facts with exhibits. 5-15 pages + exhibits.
- Factum β legal argument. Not required for short motions but strongly recommended. 5-10 pages.
- Book of Authorities β copies of relevant statutes, rules, cases. Optional but useful.
- Motion Record β bound copy of Notice of Motion + Affidavit + Exhibits. Submitted with the court fee (~$220).
Affidavit outline β draft this now
Deponent: Sarayu Seetharaman (Landlord). Abhinay may also swear a supporting affidavit as her agent on facts within his personal knowledge.
Structure (each numbered paragraph is a distinct fact):
- I am the Landlord and owner of the rental unit at 461 Green Rd, Unit 619, Stoney Creek, Ontario
- The tenancy began February 1, 2026 at a monthly rent of $2,050.00, due on the 1st of each month
- The tenants are Barbara Green and Ashley MacIntyre. Attach the signed tenancy agreement as Exhibit A
- The tenants provided two cheques at the start of the tenancy (first month + last month). Both cheques were returned by TD Bank as NSF / account not found. Attach TD Bank letter as Exhibit B
- The tenants have not paid any rent from February 2026 through the date of this affidavit. Attach Colin's July 16 Rent Arrears Ledger (Schedule A) as Exhibit C
- I served an N4 Notice for non-payment on [date]. Attach as Exhibit D
- I filed an L1 application on February 21, 2026 (LTB-L-016028-26). Hearing was held April 30, 2026 by videoconference. The tenants did not appear despite proper service. Attach original order May 14, 2026 as Exhibit E
- The tenants filed a Request to Review the order on May 26, 2026. An interim stay was granted May 27, 2026. Attach as Exhibit F
- The review hearing was held July 23, 2026 before Member Jane Dean. On July 30, 2026, the Board denied the review and lifted the stay immediately. Attach as Exhibit G
- I filed the certified LTB orders with the Hamilton Sheriff on or about [date] and paid the enforcement fee. Attach receipt as Exhibit H
- The Sheriff called on August 12, 2026 to schedule enforcement for August 20, 2026 at 1:15 PM
- On August 11, 2026 at 6:40 PM, Barbara emailed me three documents purporting to be a Notice of Appeal (Form 61A), Appellant's Certificate (Form 61C), and Affidavit of Service (Form 16B). Attach the email thread as Exhibit I and the three documents as Exhibit J
- On August [date], I confirmed with the Hamilton Divisional Court registry that Barbara had actually filed the Notice of Appeal, and obtained a copy of the filed appeal. Attach as Exhibit K (if applicable)
- The three grounds of appeal are: (i) alleged lack of notice, which was fully litigated and rejected at the July 23 review; (ii) alleged bias by the review adjudicator, which is not supported by the written reasons and requires a transcript that has not been ordered; and (iii) alleged failure to consider a payment plan, which is a discretionary/factual matter, not a question of law under s.210 RTA
- Since the tenants have never paid rent, arrears now exceed $[current amount]. Each additional month of stay adds $2,050 to my losses plus $67.40/day in daily compensation under the LTB order
- I am servicing a mortgage on this property. The absence of rent for over 6 months has caused significant financial hardship
- The tenants have shown no good faith throughout this proceeding. They provided fraudulent NSF cheques at the start. They failed to appear at the merits hearing. They filed for review at the last moment before eviction. Their appeal was served by email one week after review was denied, using an outdated form with an unsworn affidavit
- Continued stay causes ongoing irreparable financial and property loss to me. The tenants would suffer no undue prejudice from enforcement β they have already benefited from over 6 months of rent-free occupancy and their appeal is unlikely to succeed on the merits
- I ask the court to lift the stay under Rule 63.02(1)(b), or in the alternative to require the tenants to pay ongoing rent and a portion of arrears into court as a condition of maintaining any stay
Sworn in front of a commissioner (lawyer, paralegal, notary, LSO-authorized commissioner). Cost usually $20-40.
Legal authorities to cite
- Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, s.210 β appeals to Divisional Court on questions of law only
- Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 63.01(1) β automatic stay on filing Notice of Appeal for orders under the RTA
- Rule 63.02(1)(b) β court may order that a stay be lifted
- Rule 61.04(1) β appeal deemed abandoned if not filed within 10 days after service
- Practice Direction Concerning the Divisional Court, Section on LTB Appeals (October 2023) β expressly authorizes lift-stay motions and conditional stays requiring rent payment
- RJR-MacDonald Inc. v Canada (AG), [1994] 1 SCR 311 β 3-part test for stays (adapted for lift-stay context)
- Kizemchuk v 60 Montclair Limited, 2024 ONSC 6140 β Divisional Court's diligence test for LTB review; supports rejecting the same "no notice" argument on appeal
- Metropolitan Toronto Housing Authority v Godwin (1997), 32 OR (3d) 501 (Div Ct) β courts should not permit RTA appeals to become vehicles for continued rent-free occupation
The step-by-step process
- Confirm filing. Call Divisional Court registry (Hamilton, 45 Main St E). Get the court file number. Request a copy of Barbara's filed appeal materials.
- Draft the motion documents. Notice of Motion + Affidavit + Factum. Use the outline above. Print in triplicate.
- Swear the affidavit. Sarayu attends a commissioner (any lawyer, paralegal, notary, or ServiceOntario has commissioners). Costs $20-40.
- Assemble the Motion Record. Bind with tab dividers. Table of contents on front page.
- File at Divisional Court registry. Pay the motion filing fee (~$220). Get 3 stamped copies back.
- Request an urgent hearing date. Ask the registry to schedule as soon as possible given the ongoing prejudice. Provide dates you're available in the next 2-3 weeks.
- Serve Barbara. Personal service is safest. Alternative: email if she has previously accepted email service (she did serve you by email, so a case for reciprocal email service exists).
- File proof of service (Form 16B, properly sworn) with the court.
- Appear at the motion. Sarayu is the named party but Abhinay may attend as her agent. Speak from the affidavit. Be professional, factual, brief.
- Obtain the order. If granted, immediately serve on the Sheriff to resume enforcement scheduling.
Timeline expectations
| Day | Action |
|---|---|
| Day 0 (appeal filed) | Sheriff cancels lockout. You confirm filing. |
| Day 1-3 | Draft motion documents. Contact lawyer for limited-scope quote if not already done. |
| Day 3-5 | Swear affidavit. Assemble motion record. File at Divisional Court. |
| Day 5-7 | Serve Barbara. Follow up with registry for hearing date. |
| Day 7-21 | Motion heard. Depending on Divisional Court availability, expect 1-3 weeks from filing to hearing. |
| Day 21-28 | If granted: serve order on Sheriff. Sheriff reschedules lockout (usually 2-4 weeks from receipt of order). |
| Total realistic delay: | 6-10 weeks from Barbara's filing to new lockout date |
During this entire period, tenants continue to occupy the unit without paying rent. Every day increases your arrears claim and your s.83-relevant equitable position.
Cost estimates
| Path | Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Self-representation | ~$260 | Motion filing $220 + commissioner $40. Zero legal fees. |
| Limited-scope lawyer | $3,000-5,000 | Draft motion + appear at hearing. Recommended given complexity. |
| Full-service lawyer (defend entire appeal) | $10,000-25,000+ | If Barbara succeeds at lift-stay motion, she may pursue appeal to conclusion; you'd need to defend |
What favors self-representation
- Facts are clean and one-sided (never paid rent, appeal grounds weak)
- Motion type is well-precedented (courts see many of these)
- Divisional Court's Practice Direction explicitly contemplates this exact motion
- Barbara is also self-representing (level playing field)
- You have documentary evidence already prepared
- You're an intelligent professional who has managed this case rigorously
What works against self-representation
- Divisional Court expects proper court formatting for factums, motion records, affidavits
- Rules of Civil Procedure are more technical than LTB Rules
- Judges have limited patience for procedural stumbles
- Emergency motions on short notice compress your prep time
- If you lose the motion, appeal drags 12-18 months with tenant in place, no rent
- If you win at self-rep motion, costs award may be lower than lawyer costs (self-reps often don't recover full time)
My honest recommendation
Hire a lawyer for the lift-stay motion. Rationale:
- The stakes are enormous β losing the motion means 12-18 months of continued zero-rent occupation
- $3-5k for a limited-scope retainer is small compared to $30k+ in lost rent if you lose or lawyer up later
- Divisional Court is unforgiving of procedural errors
- A lawyer's affidavit + factum carries more weight than a self-rep's, all else equal
- Your time is worth something β a lawyer takes 5-10 hours; you'd take 30-50 hours to do it well
Reserve self-representation for scenarios where you truly cannot afford counsel or cannot find one available on the timeline.
Immediate action if Barbara files
- Confirm filing with registry immediately β get the court file number and details
- Notify Colin β even though he can't represent, he can advise on strategy
- Call Josh Azan and the Monday lawyer β activate the lawyer search
- Get 3 quotes for limited-scope retainer within 48 hours
- Preserve everything β file the filed appeal in the case folder immediately
- Start drafting affidavit in parallel (whoever handles the motion will need it)
- Do NOT contact Barbara β everything through counsel or Colin
- Do NOT delay β every week is $2,050 in lost rent
π± Post-Lockout Playbook
Phone-friendly reference for during the actual event. Optimized for skimming on a phone screen while standing in the hallway.
π¬ Right after the Sheriff clears the unit
Do these in order:
- Locksmith rekeys immediately. Do not enter or start walkthrough until new locks are installed. Pay locksmith.
- Note exact time of possession transfer. Write it on your Contact Numbers Page. You will need this for the retrieval notice.
- Take one wide shot of the entire unit from the doorway before touching anything. Overall condition timestamp.
- Do the full video walkthrough (see checklist below).
- Consolidate personal items in labelled boxes near the door (see checklist below).
- Send the 72-hour retrieval notice to Barbara (see below β pre-drafted).
- Text Colin to confirm eviction is complete.
- Lock the unit and leave. You do NOT need to stay longer.
πΉ Video walkthrough checklist
One continuous video, narrated. Do not stop and restart.
Start at the front door. State out loud:
Walk through in order. Show every room. Narrate as you go:
- β Front door β inside condition, lock mechanism
- β Entryway / hallway
- β Living room (all walls, ceiling, floors)
- β Kitchen (cabinets open + closed, appliances, sink, floor, fridge open, freezer open)
- β Dining area
- β Bedroom 1 (walls, ceiling, closet open, floor)
- β Bedroom 2 (if applicable)
- β Bathroom (tub, toilet, sink, floor, walls, mirror, medicine cabinet)
- β Any storage / laundry space
- β Balcony / patio (if applicable)
- β Windows β check they close and lock
- β Any obvious damage β close-up on each item, state what it is
- β Any obvious garbage/mess β pan across
- β End back at front door β say "walkthrough complete, [DATE] [TIME]"
After video: take individual photos (not video) of any specific damage. Time-stamped by iPhone metadata.
π¦ Consolidate personal items β checklist
Purpose: gather Barbara's belongings so she can retrieve at the entrance without needing to enter the unit itself.
What to actively consolidate into labelled boxes:
- β ID documents (passport, driver's licence, health card, SIN card, birth certificates)
- β Medication (prescription bottles, insulin, inhalers β anything medical)
- β Keys (car, other property, mailbox)
- β Wallet, cash, credit cards
- β Phone chargers and phones
- β Laptop / tablet
- β Mail (open + unopened)
- β Family photos (obvious sentimental items)
- β Jewellery box or obvious valuables
Label each box with painter's tape: "PERSONAL - BARBARA GREEN - Aug 20, 2026"
Stage boxes near the front door so retrieval can happen without entering the unit.
DO NOT: read personal papers, open envelopes, sort through belongings, photograph the contents of drawers/documents. Consolidate as-is, don't investigate.
Furniture, clothing, dishes, general belongings: leave in place OR bag/box loosely for later retrieval. Don't spend hours packing everything β she has 72 hours to arrange proper retrieval.
π’ If Barbara mentions the Aug 11 appeal at the door
Nothing changes. The Sheriff proceeds with enforcement.
Emailing appeal documents is not a stay. Only a filed Notice of Appeal + issued Certificate of Stay + delivery to the Sheriff would stop enforcement. Barbara has done none of those (confirmed by registry Wed Aug 19).
Sheriff's likely response to her:
She won't have one. Sheriff proceeds.
YOUR response to her β as little as possible:
DO NOT:
- Explain Rule 61.04 or the Certificate of Stay requirement
- Tell her she didn't actually file properly
- Correct her legal misunderstandings
- Defend yourself or your position
- Argue merits of the case
- Smile, gloat, or appear satisfied
- Say "I'm sorry" (can be misinterpreted)
Every word you say is potential ammunition for a future s.57 or T2 application. Silence is your best posture.
If she asks practical questions (retrieval, mail): brief factual answer, in-writing follow-through.
If she asks personal questions (where do I go tonight): do not answer.
If she threatens legal action ("I'll sue you," "my lawyer will hear about this"): silence. Every threat gets recorded on your video and can be used against her later.
If she becomes aggressive: step back, physical distance, video rolling. If she escalates to physical aggression: Sheriff or you calls 911.
π Sheriff's proof of enforcement
The Sheriff should give you a Return of Writ (aka Return of Enforcement) at the scene. This document confirms:
- Date and time of enforcement
- Address of the unit
- LTB file number
- Transfer of possession to landlord
- Officer name and signature
Ask for a copy BEFORE the officer leaves. If they say they'll mail it, ask if you can take a photo of the completed form on the spot.
Also take your own proof:
- Dated photos of the front door with new locks
- A short selfie video: "It is [DATE] at [TIME]. The Sheriff has just completed enforcement of order LTB-L-016028-26 at Unit 619, 461 Green Rd, and transferred possession to Sarayu Seetharaman."
If no paper document was given, call 905-645-5323 within 24 hours: "I'd like a copy of the Return of Writ for enforcement completed today at Unit 619, 461 Green Rd. Please email to abhinay.natraj@gmail.com."
Why it matters: needed for Small Claims Court money judgment filing, insurance/mortgage confirmation, tenant screening, potential T2 counter-application defence.
π¨ If Barbara comes back AFTER the Sheriff leaves
She has NO legal right to enter the unit anymore. Possession is Sarayu's. Any entry or refusal to leave is trespass.
She rings the doorbell / knocks asking for her things:
- DO NOT open the door.
- Through the door: "I'm not opening the door. Please leave the property. I'll email retrieval details."
- Text her the retrieval notice right then even if you were going to send later.
- If she keeps knocking / shouting: video from inside, keep door locked.
- If she won't leave in 10+ min OR becomes aggressive: call Hamilton Police non-emergency 905-546-4925. "A former tenant is refusing to leave the property after her eviction was enforced by the Sheriff today. She has no legal right to be here."
She breaks in / forces entry:
- Call 911 immediately. This is now break and enter (s.348 Criminal Code).
- Do NOT confront physically. Retreat to safety.
- Video from a safe distance.
- Police attend as priority.
She calls or messages asking to retrieve immediately:
- DO NOT respond to phone calls or in-person requests to arrange retrieval on the fly.
- Only respond in writing: "I received your message. Please send retrieval requests by email to abhinay.natraj@gmail.com so we have written records. I'll respond within 24 hours with a proposed 90-minute pickup window."
Key rules for the 72 hours:
- All contact in writing only. Text and email. No phone conversations, no doorstep chats.
- Never open the door without a scheduled window and a witness present.
- Video everything from the moment she's on the property.
- Keep new keys on your person β do not leave a copy accessible.
- Consider changing the mailbox key if she may have taken it during lockout.
πΎ If you find a pet inside
If a dog, cat, bird, or other pet is inside when the Sheriff enters:
- Do NOT harm, chase, or turn out the pet
- Photograph the pet in place
- Immediately call Hamilton Animal Services: 905-574-3433
- They may take the animal, or coordinate with the tenant for pickup
- Note this in your retrieval notice to Barbara (add a line: "A [pet type] was found in the unit and has been contacted with [Hamilton Animal Services / consolidated in the unit for immediate pickup]")
Do NOT close and lock the unit with a pet inside without arranging care. If Animal Services can't come quickly, contact the tenant emergency number to arrange immediate pickup.
π§ Send this email to Barbara after enforcement
Copy-paste ready. Fill in only the exact enforcement time.
To: bamaccx@gmail.com
CC: bmacic5653@yahoo.ca
Subject: Retrieval of personal belongings from 461 Green Rd Unit 619 β deadline Sunday August 23, 2026 at 1:30 PM
Also send a short text to both numbers (289-659-5628 and 647-509-3262):
Screenshot both the email and the texts after sending. Save the screenshots in a folder called "Aug 20 Retrieval Notice Sent" so you have proof of transmission.
π¬ Text Colin to close the loop
To: Colin Mitchell β 289-878-5111
π¨ If Barbara shows up during the lockout or unexpectedly
She has NO legal right to be at the property or to interfere with enforcement.
- Stay calm. Do not raise your voice.
- Say: "The Sheriff is here to enforce the eviction order. You need to step back and let them do their job."
- Let her grab a few essentials briefly if the Sheriff allows (medication, ID, wallet, phone)
- Do NOT let her enter the unit to pack, argue, or delay.
- Tell her: "You can arrange to retrieve everything else within 72 hours. I'll send details in writing to your email today."
- If she becomes aggressive, call 911 immediately.
- Video everything from the moment she becomes hostile.
Do NOT engage in any conversation about the case, the appeal, the money, or the past. Only about the practical retrieval process.
β Final checklist before you leave the unit
- β Locks rekeyed (test the new key works)
- β All windows closed and locked
- β All appliances off (stove, oven β check both!)
- β Fridge/freezer β leave contents in place OR remove obvious perishables (your call)
- β Water taps off
- β Personal items consolidated and labelled near door
- β Video walkthrough saved to phone
- β Individual damage photos taken
- β Retrieval email sent to Barbara
- β Retrieval text sent to both her numbers
- β Screenshots of email and text saved
- β Colin texted
- β New keys in your possession (do not leave any keys behind)
- β Unit locked
- β Enforcement time noted on Contact Numbers Page
π How many retrieval visits does she get?
Legally: as many as needed within the 72 hours, as long as you both agree on times.
Practically: YOU control the schedule. She has no right to a key, no right to enter unsupervised, no right to demand times. But you must give her a "reasonable opportunity" to retrieve.
Recommended pattern for your case:
- Offer one 90-minute window first (e.g., Saturday 10:00-11:30 AM).
- If she asks for a second window, grant one 60-90 minute follow-up as courtesy (e.g., Sunday 10:00-11:00 AM). Send confirmation in writing calling it "final opportunity."
- Third request or beyond: decline politely in writing. "I've accommodated two windows. The 72-hour period ends Sunday at 1:30 PM."
- Emergency-sounding requests (medication, ID for job interview): grant a brief supervised visit even if third window. Documents like ID and prescriptions have urgency a reasonable landlord accommodates.
Rules for every retrieval visit:
- Two people from your side present at all times. Never solo.
- Video from the moment she arrives to the moment she leaves.
- Belongings staged outside the unit; she does not enter.
- Fixed start and end time. If she's still there at end time: "The window is closing. We need to lock up."
- She provides her own transport and help; you don't move stuff for her.
- No conversation about the case. If she brings it up: "I'm not discussing that. Let's focus on the items."
- Signed receipt at the end.
- Do not let her back in after she leaves.
After 1:30 PM Sunday Aug 23: your 72-hour obligation ends. Remaining items can be disposed of. Any further requests: "The 72-hour period has expired."
π You're done. Go home.
Once the unit is locked and the notice is sent, your work today is complete. Barbara has 72 hours to arrange retrieval. Your only obligations between now and Sunday Aug 23 at 1:30 PM are:
- Check email + texts for Barbara's response
- Reply in writing only, with a fixed 90-minute pickup window if she wants one
- Show up for the retrieval if arranged (2 people present, video rolling)
- After 1:30 PM Sunday, remaining items can be legally disposed of
Congratulations. This was a long road from April.
Appeal Analysis β Barbara's Aug 11 Filing
Bottom line
The appeal is procedurally dangerous because it may create a stay if actually filed. But the appeal is very weak on merits, the documents are defective, and there's a real chance she never actually files with the court.
What Barbara sent (Aug 11, 2026, ~9pm)
- Form 61A.1 β Notice of Appeal to Divisional Court
- Form 61C β Appellant's Certificate Respecting Evidence
- Form 16B β Affidavit of Service (defective β unsworn)
Her three grounds β analyzed
Ground 1: "Never received Notice of Hearing" β SAME issue already litigated
This is exactly the argument Member Jane Dean already rejected at the July 30 review. She heard evidence on this, found Barbara's testimony contradictory, and applied the binding Divisional Court authority in Kizemchuk v 60 Montclair Limited, 2024 ONSC 6140.
Under s.210 RTA, appeals to Divisional Court are on questions of law only, not questions of fact. Findings of credibility are almost impossible to overturn on appeal.
Prospect of success: Very low.
Ground 2: "Adjudicator showed bias, used financial status against appellant, said 'taking advantage'" β APPEARS FABRICATED
Jane Dean's July 30 order says none of this. There is no mention of Barbara's financial status. There is no quote about "taking advantage." The reasoning is entirely about diligence in receiving notice.
To prove bias or improper conduct, Barbara would need a transcript of the July 23 hearing showing what the adjudicator actually said orally. Her Form 61C lists only the order itself β no transcript ordered. Without a transcript, this ground collapses.
Prospect of success: Extremely low.
Ground 3: "Failed to consider payment plan proposal" β WEAK
Barbara didn't offer a payment plan at the review hearing. Her only request was for one more month to move out. She had 8 weeks between the interim stay (May 27) and the review hearing (July 23) to propose anything and never did.
Even if she had proposed one, whether to accept is a discretionary/factual decision for the Member β not a question of law.
Prospect of success: Very low.
Defects in her documents
- Form 16B Affidavit of Service is fatally defective β unsworn, unsigned in operative sections, uncommissioned; uses boilerplate about serving the Crown / AG / Public Guardian which doesn't apply
- Sarayu's name misspelled throughout: "Saryu Seethmaran" (should be Sarayu Seetharaman)
- Courthouse misspelled: "John Sopnika" (should be Sopinka)
- Wrong postal code: L8E 0L5 (should be L8E 5B4)
- Form 61A.1 is dated September 2018 β outdated
- NO court file number, NO court stamp, NO Certificate of Stay attached β strongly suggests she has NOT actually filed with the court
- Form 61C lists only the review order as required evidence β no transcript means Ground 2 has no evidentiary basis
- Service by email on an unrepresented respondent may not be valid service under Rule 16.05 without prior consent
The 10-day rule (Rule 61.04)
Under Rule 61.04(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure: if the appellant serves the Notice of Appeal but does not file it with the court within 10 days after service, the appeal is deemed abandoned.
Barbara served on Aug 11, 2026. She must file with the Divisional Court by Aug 21, 2026 or the appeal dies automatically.
Given how sloppy her documents are, there is a real possibility she never actually completes filing.
Colin's assessment (summary)
"The appeal is procedurally dangerous because it may create another stay if it has been filed. However, the appeal is not especially strong on its face. It does not raise the technical issues that would have been most dangerous. It largely repeats the notice argument already rejected at the review hearing. Its bias allegations are difficult to prove without a transcript. Its payment-plan argument is mostly factual and discretionary rather than a question of law. The affidavit of service is defective. There is no court file number or filed copy yet. There is no transcript. There is no proper evidentiary foundation for many of the allegations."
Colin's scope limit
Colin cannot represent you at the Divisional Court. Ontario paralegals are licensed for LTB matters but not for Divisional Court appearances. If you need a lift-stay motion, you have two options:
- Self-represent β feasible given strong facts, but formal motion procedure is intimidating without experience
- Limited-scope lawyer retainer β ~$3,000-6,000 for just the lift-stay motion (much less than a full appeal defence at $15k+)
Call 2-3 landlord-tenant lawyers to shop rates. Toronto and Hamilton both have specialists.
Motion to lift stay β if she files
Under the Divisional Court's Practice Direction on Motions Related to Appeals of Landlord and Tenant Board Orders (October 2023), the court can:
- Lift the stay entirely
- Require tenant to pay ongoing rent as condition of maintaining stay
- Require tenant to pay a portion of accrued arrears
- Require tenant to post security
- Set an expedited timetable for the appeal
Your facts are ideal for this motion: tenants have paid zero rent since February 2026, review already denied on merits, grounds 2 and 3 appear fabricated. The Practice Direction was written exactly for this scenario.
Scripts & Templates
π Divisional Court registry β silent verification call
Who calls: Colin ideally. If Colin unavailable, Sarayu.
Number to try first: 905-525-5321 (Hamilton Superior Court general line)
If they can't help by phone: Ask what registry office handles Divisional Court appeals for Hamilton region. Divisional Court appeals are sometimes filed at Toronto (Osgoode Hall). Try:
- Divisional Court Toronto registry: 416-327-5100
- Osgoode Hall: 130 Queen St W, Toronto
π§ Reply to Colin (draft)
Subject: Re: Barbara Green appeal β Sheriff filing status + registry check request
Colin,
Thank you for the detailed memo. Very helpful. One important update
I should have mentioned earlier: I already filed the certified orders
with the Hamilton Sheriff last week and paid the enforcement fee. They
said someone would call 3 days before enforcement. That call has not
come yet, which fits the 2-4 week Hamilton wait time.
So the concern is really whether Barbara's appeal is actually filed
with the Divisional Court, and whether that pauses the Sheriff's
scheduling.
Requests:
1. Can you (or your office) call the Divisional Court registry this
week to verify whether a Notice of Appeal has actually been filed
(not just emailed to me)? I'd like to avoid emailing Barbara because
I don't want to prompt her to complete the filing.
2. If it turns out she has filed, please share your view on:
- Whether self-representing the lift-stay motion is realistic
- Any lawyer referrals you have for a limited-scope retainer
- Approximate cost of a lift-stay motion
3. Please confirm the cost for the registry check + strategy call so I
can authorize the additional Phase Two work on the retainer.
Preserving Barbara's email exactly as received. Not contacting her.
Standing by for your next steps.
Thanks,
Abhiney
647-467-3649
π§ Email to Barbara β ONLY if Colin advises
β Do not send unless Colin recommends after registry check. Sending prompts her to complete filing.
Subject: Documents received Aug 11, 2026
Barbara,
We acknowledge receipt of the documents you emailed on August 11, 2026.
Please provide:
- a filed and stamped copy of the Notice of Appeal;
- the Divisional Court file number;
- proof that the appeal has been filed with the Court; and
- any Certificate of Stay you have obtained.
For clarity, we do not admit that service was valid, that the appeal
has been properly commenced, or that any stay is currently in effect.
Please provide the requested information immediately.
Regards,
Sarayu Seetharaman
(through Colin Mitchell, Parallax Paralegal Services)
π When the Sheriff calls β script
That's it. No questions about the appeal. No mention of tenants' recent communications.
π Locksmith outreach
Call 2-3 Hamilton-area locksmiths, ask specifically for LTB eviction lockout services:
- Google: "Hamilton locksmith LTB eviction"
- Ask: rate for residential rekey (~$150-250 is typical)
- Ask: availability on 3 days' notice
- Ask: do they accept e-transfer / cash / card on site
- Ask: how long does the rekey take (usually 30-45 min for a standard apartment)
Get their card / contact and hold on standby.
πΈ Post-enforcement documentation
Immediately after Sheriff hands you possession:
- Photograph every room, every wall, every fixture (time-stamped by phone metadata)
- Take video walkthrough (30-60 sec)
- Photograph any belongings left behind (needed for the 72-hour storage record)
- Note any damage in writing while it's fresh
- Change locks BEFORE leaving the unit unattended
- Keep receipts for locksmith, any cleanup, any repairs β recoverable from tenants via Small Claims
Case Files Index
All files at /Users/abhi/Projects/LTB/
Colin's key filings for the review hearing
July 16, 2026 β Colin's L1/L9 Information Update + Schedule A July 23, 2026 β Colin's Certificate of Service (IUS + Landlord Document Brief)Original orders (certified)
May 14, 2026 β Original eviction order (LTB-L-016028-26) May 27, 2026 β Interim stay order July 30, 2026 β Review order (DENIED)Second L1 (parallel filing)
July 13, 2026 β Colin's procedural direction motion (33 pages)Colin's paralegal memo (post-appeal)
Aug 11, 2026 β Colin's memo re Divisional Court appealAug 11, 2026 β Tenant service email (preserved)
Aug 11, 2026 β Gmail thread: Barbara β Abhinay β Colin β Josh AzanTenant appeal filings (Aug 11, 2026) β DEFECTIVE
Form 61A.1 β Notice of Appeal Form 61C β Appellant's Certificate Form 16B β Affidavit of ServiceSupporting evidence & original application
L1 Application Copy (Feb 21, 2026) N4 Notice Certificate of Service L1/L9 Information Update TD Bank letter (NSF cheque evidence) Tenancy Agreement Email receiptPlanning docs (drafted; some still useful)
A β Sheriff Filing Cover Letter (now historical, filing complete) B β Police Report re NSF fraud (still to file) C β Daily Compensation Tracker (CSV) D β Small Claims Enforcement Plan (post-eviction) E β Police Station Document ChecklistDocuments Tracker β What's In vs. Still Needed
β Complete coverage of all core case documents
All three LTB orders (May 14 original, May 27 interim stay, July 30 review denial), the L1 application, N4, Certificate of Service, L1/L9 Information Update, both Notices of Hearing, Colin's July 13 procedural direction package (which also contains the new L1 as Tab C and its Sept 9 NoH as Tab D), and all three tenant appeal filings from Aug 11 are in the case folder.
π₯ Documents to add (you have these somewhere β please drop into /Users/abhi/Projects/LTB/)
π₯ Documents that will emerge in the coming days
π₯ Downstream documents (once eviction complete)
π‘ Notes on evidence value
The 4 screenshots dated Apr 21, 2026 in your case folder are the iMessage evidence between Sarayu and Barbara that was introduced at the July 23 review hearing. The July 30 review order at paragraph 8 explicitly references them: "the Landlord submitted an exchange of screen shots taken from imessages between the parties in which the party identified as 'Barbara Green' responds to the Landlord writing that the cheques provided had been returned by the bank." Keep these safe β they're evidence Barbara knew about the tenancy issues and communicated with Sarayu, which contradicts her "no notice" claim.
The ltb-explanation.docx is Sarayu's own contemporaneous written statement to the LTB about the NSF cheques. TD Canada Trust said they "couldn't trace the account the cheque came from" β this is stronger than just NSF, it suggests the account may not have existed at all. This is important for the police report on Criminal Code s.362 (false pretences) / s.380 (fraud).
Strategy Notes
The three parallel tracks
π Track 1: Eviction
Sheriff filed. Waiting. Handle any appeal via silent verification then motion to lift stay if needed.
Success metric: Vacant possession by end of Aug or early Sept 2026.
π° Track 2: Money Judgment
Two options: use original May 14 order OR the new L1 (Sept 9 hearing). File with Small Claims after eviction. Examine debtor first.
Success metric: Some meaningful garnishment or judgment on record.
π Track 3: Criminal Fraud
NSF cheques constitute s.362/380 CCC fraud. Hamilton Police report. Take July 30 order as judicial finding of no rent ever paid.
Success metric: Occurrence number logged, potentially criminal restitution order.
Decision points coming up
- Aug 21 deadline: If Barbara doesn't file by then, appeal dies. If she does, decide lift-stay strategy.
- Self-rep vs lawyer for lift-stay motion: $3-6k for lawyer is small vs $50k+ daily comp cap. Probably worth hiring for peace of mind.
- Sept 9 L1 β keep or withdraw: Ask Colin. Recommendation: keep because it captures Feb-Jul arrears as a fresh money judgment, useful for Small Claims.
- Rule 21 slip correction: July 30 order says Ashley is "Landlord's daughter" β factual error. Correcting adds administrative overhead but cleans the record.
- Costs order: Ask Colin whether to seek costs against tenants for the failed review + potentially abusive appeal.
The three biggest risks
- Barbara actually files the appeal within 10 days. Requires lift-stay motion. Delay of 1-3 months. Cost $3-6k lawyer or self-rep effort.
- Tenants remove valuable items or damage the unit before Sheriff arrives. Common. Recoverable via Small Claims but often uncollectable in practice.
- Nov 26, 2026 s.81 backstop. Original eviction expires if not enforced. You've already filed with Sheriff so you're safe β but if the appeal delays enforcement past Nov 26 without a court order extending, this becomes a real concern. Colin should watch this.
Advantages you hold
- β Order is confirmed on merits, not just default
- β Sheriff already filed β no scramble
- β Tenants have paid zero rent β sympathetic facts for lift-stay motion
- β Barbara is self-represented and disorganized β sloppy documents, missed procedural requirements
- β Colin is on retainer and knows the file inside out
- β Parallel L1 filed as insurance
- β Judicial finding on record: "the initial cheques were returned and they have never paid rent since that date" β usable for police report + Small Claims
- β Ashley never appeared at any hearing β undermines any claim of coordinated tenant action
What NOT to do (bright lines)
- β Contact Barbara or Ashley directly
- β Offer money-for-keys or settlement at this stage
- β Attempt self-help removal or lockout (illegal)
- β Volunteer information about the appeal to the Sheriff
- β Delay the Sheriff enforcement voluntarily
- β Post anything about the case on social media
- β Rely solely on memory for facts / dates β always check documents
- β Panic-hire an expensive lawyer without shopping rates